Posted on December 17, 2016 by admin. DxOMark completed their review of the new Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lens. Tested on the Canon EOS 5DS R, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lens achieved an excellent overall DxOMark score of 34 points, with a combination of 24 P-Mpix Sharpness, 3.1 TStop Transmission, 0.4% Distortion, -1.7 EV Canon 16-35 F2.8 L II; Priced similar as option 1, I get a single-lens solution, but this lens has got some critical review since III version came, but third version is LOT expensive too. I am confused if this is good or better than Option 1, then I can simply get this lens for both astro and landscape usage. Option 3. Canon 16-35 F2.8 L III My take on the 14-24 ART from the same web-site was the 14-24 corners were mush at 24. the corners on the rf14-35 at 35 were far better. But I will admit that 35mm is the weakest spot of the RF 14-35 but still much better than the 14-24 f2.8 sigma . Well of course, every single lens has its strong sides and drawbacks. Our review. The updated Canon 16-35mm F2.8L III offers some incredible performance wide open at 16mm. It's one of the sharpest wide angle zoom lens options on the market. Many of the issues such as coma, chromatic aberration and corner sharpness have all been addressed in this update and the results are impressive. The EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM employs Canon's famous rear-focus telephoto optical design that delivers outstanding picture quality throughout its entire focusing range. Like its high-end siblings, this lens also uses two ultra-low dispersion glass elements to ensure maximum image sharpness and accurate color fidelity. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM The new Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM is an ideal lens for professional photographers who shoot with the Canon 1D and 5D series of DSLR cameras. The inclusion of Air Sphere Coating (ASC) technology helps to reduce flaring and ghosting, and suppresses the reflection of light. 3IuGIw. 16-35 f2.8 L III; 16-35 f2.8 L III and retain the old 24-70 f2.8 L Series 1, in case it's worth it !) Thanks. K. The 16-35 / 4L IS is much smaller, lighter, and less expensive than the 16-35 / 2.8L III and for landscape photography, you'll likely be at f/5.6 or higher f-numbers. For this reason we're not going to consider this lens for use on the APS-C platform in this review. Canon 16-35mm F2.8L III USM Headline Features. Fully weather-sealed construction; F2.8 maximum aperture; 16-35mm focal range; Sub-wavelength Coatings (SWC) and Air Sphere Coatings (ASC) to eliminate lens flare and ghosting The RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM lens is the final member in a trio of stabilised, L-series f/2.8 lenses announced by Canon at the end of August in 2019. We reviewed the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens in December 2019 and the RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM lens in January 2020. All three lenses include built-in stabilisation, with up to five stops of That's right. I dropped my Canon EOS 5D Mark III with an EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens attached into the Caribbean Sea. Fortunately, it was in an Ewa-Marine U-B 100 Underwater Housing. As I have mentioned, my landscape photography plans did not work out as well as planned on my recent St John, USVI photo trip, but I had a backup plan. In real world testing the sharpness at the edges of the frame when wide open on the older f/2.8 lens seems sharper at 16mm and softer at 35mm. Ironically, the inverse is the case for the f/4 which seems to be sharper in the center of the frame but softer at the edges at 16mm than the f/2.8, yet much better than the f/2.8 lens at 35mm. The 17-35mm f/2.8 D AF-S is a solid professional lens. It’s got great optics, mechanics and performance, and you pay for it. The 17-35mm is the wide-lens ticket for the D700, D3x and D3. The 17-35 works on DX, it’s just bigger, costs more and works less conveniently than lenses designed to for DX. It works great on manual-focus cameras.

canon ef 16 35mm f 2.8 l iii usm review